Skip to main content
Skip to and open main menu Home Modification Resources
Provided by the HMinfo Clearinghouse
Translating high quality research specific to better design and building practice
Translating high quality research specific to better design and building practice

Evaluation of the national and NSW HACC-funded home modification and home maintenance service usage as reported by the 2001/2002

Download Publication (pdf 2.23 MiB)

Authors Bridge, C., Hodges, L.
Published
Audience Authors, Government/NGOs/Peaks, Industry, Librarians/Researchers/Students
ISBN ISBN: 1 86487

This report analyses the reported client usage and client information pertaining to Home and Community Care (HACC) Program for HACC-funded home modification and home maintenance services as reported by the 2001/2002 – 2005/2006 HACC Minimum Data Set (MDS).

Publication History

1st edition Evaluation of the national and NSW HACC-funded home modification and home maintenance service usage as reported by the 2001/2002 – 2005/2006 HACC MDS by Lisa Hodges and Catherine Bridge, August 2007. Reprinted June 2014.


Table of Contents

  • Glossary
  • Executive Summary
  • Introduction
  • Project aims
  • Overview of results
    • Who is accessing HACC-funded home modification and home maintenance services?
    • Links to other services evident in the home modification and home maintenance data
    • Completion of required reporting
    • Privacy and confidentiality
  • Conclusion
  • Contextual Background of the research
  • Introduction to the Home and Community Care (HACC) Program
  • Home modification and home maintenance
  • HACC in New South Wales
  • Introduction to the HACC Minimum Data Set (MDS)
  • Aims of the study
    • Key research questions
    • Outputs
  • Relevant variables and definitions
  • What is ‘accessibility’?
  • What is ‘access’ to HACC-funded services?
  • What is coordinated, planned, and reliable service delivery?
  • What variables are critical to outcome?
  • What is a ‘target group’
  • What is a ‘special needs group’
  • How might funding levels be compared across regions and programs?

Reads 4071 Downloads 911

Feedback Form

You may use the following form to send us anonymous feedback on this publication.

* Denotes required fields


Verification